Journal Discussion for Reliability and Validity- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theJournal Discussion for Reliability and Validity. Answer: In the journal posting, a study (Conditions, components and outcomes of Integrative Validation Therapy in a long-term care facility for people with dementia: A qualitative evaluation study) is discussed. The posting covers a holistic view of the study as well as opinion or views about the study. The discussion is quite detailed and analytical when looking at the article. However, the review failed to address some areas that are important when looking at such studies. The outcome of the study was that the participants appreciated the progress introduced by IVA and the personal nature of the approach(Erdmann Schnepp, 2016). The doctors opinion was that there was reduced agitation and medication required was reduced(Erdmann Schnepp, 2016). All participants felt that the IVA had positive results and positive outcomes were noted between management and employees(Erdmann Schnepp, 2016). The journal posting provides an opinion that the qualitative studies are complex and difficult to anal yse. It also noted the difficulty in establishing reliability and validity. In essence, the journal posting made these comments, but made no suggestions on how the situation could be improved. The posting also noted that the study was unclear in relation to the frequency of undertaking IVA. In response, it is important to note that the posting should have provided some solutions on how future studies, especially qualitative ones, could ensure reliability and validity. If the same cannot be achieved, a suggestion to switch to other research methods could be made. The author should also have focussed more on the positive outcomes of the study and how the same can be improved and validated. In the study, positive outcomes are noted and this should be enhanced. It means that it is proper to give examples of much needed further studies to either validate results or improve them. On a positive note, the author noted the importance of developing more knowledge on communication techniques when working with people with dementia (PWD). The work of N. Feil noted that dementia patients have stages that can include poor orientation, time confusion, repetitive motion, and being in a vegetative state(Jones, 2006). It means that communicating with such patients is very important, but increasingly difficult to achieve(Atta-ur-Rahman, 2016). Therefore, more studies and experiments on communication techniques are warranted. In retrospect, the study under review does two very important things. It gives a positive finding on the application of the IVA technique. Secondly, it introduces quite a number of questions and issues for exploration. These are the questions and issues that are not addressed in the journal posting. Future researchers should now consider the accuracy of this study, validity, reliability, and other techniques that can achieve results. It is also important to consider how the positive results of the IVA technique could be enhanced. Better communication techniques, impacts of IVA on staff, family members, a nd management should be explored(Smith, 2017). It is logical also to compare IVA with other existing techniques to understand its advantages and drawbacks(Smith, 2017). The shortcomings, especially in relation to PWD, should be a primary concern. Once all these issues are addressed, the IVA technique will advance in its application and PWD can benefit from this technique. References Atta-ur-Rahman. (2016). Frontiers in Clinical Drug Research - Alzheimer Disorders, Volume 5. Bentham Science Publishers. Erdmann, Schnepp. (2016). Conditions, components and outcomes of Integrative Validation Therapy in a long-term care facility for people with dementia. A qualitative evaluation study. Dementia, 15(5), 1184-204. Jones, G. M. (2006). Care-giving in Dementia: Research and Applications. Psychology Press. Smith, P. T. (2017). Dementia Care - The Adaptive Response: A Stress Reductionist Approach. Taylor Francis,.